What did Philip Zimbardo do psychology?

What did Philip Zimbardo contribute to psychology?

Dr. Zimbardo, a professor of psychology at Stanford for over 30 years, is known for his work on the Stanford prison experiment which demonstrated the power of social situations through a mock prison experiment with normal, healthy college students.

What did Zimbardo aim to find out about social psychology?

Zimbardo (1973) conducted an extremely controversial study on conformity to social roles, called the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’. His aim was to examine whether people would conform to the social roles of a prison guard or prisoner, when placed in a mock prison environment.

What was the purpose of Philip Zimbardo’s experiment?

A: The purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment. Q: Who funded the experiment? A: The study was funded by a government grant from the U.S. Office of Naval Research to study antisocial behavior.

Is Philip Zimbardo a good psychologist?

Philip Zimbardo is a contemporary social psychologist best known for his Stanford Prison Study.

What did Leon Festinger do psychology?

Leon Festinger was one of the most important figures in modern psychology and contributed several theories that are still important today for our understanding of the communication process, particularly the individual’s exposure to communication and processes of opinion formation and judgment (→ Cognitive Dissonance …

THIS IS INTERESTING:  What is molecular behavior genetics?

What was Zimbardo trying to prove?

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Zimbardo and his colleagues (1973) were interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards (i.e., dispositional) or had more to do with the prison environment (i.e., situational).

Was Zimbardo’s experiment ethical or unethical?

As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would escalate to the point of abuse that it did. … It’s hard to perceive the whole process,” Zimbardo said.